Pluralizing field analysis: Toward a relational understanding of the field of power

Staats- und Gesellschaftswissenschaften

Schmitz, Andreas, Witte, Daniel, Gengnagel, Vincent

Pluralizing field analysis: Toward a relational understanding of the field of power

Schmitz, Andreas, Witte, Daniel, Gengnagel, Vincent: Pluralizing field analysis: Toward a relational understanding of the field of power, Social Science Information / Information sur les sciences sociales, 2017; Jg. 2016 (56) Suppl. 1: 49-73: http://10.1177/0539018416675071 (download: https://www.academia.edu/29726652/Schmitz_Witte_and_Gengnagel_2016_Pluralizing_field_analysis_Toward_a_relational_understanding_of_the_field_of_power) .

Originalarbeiten in wissenschaftlichen Fachzeitschriften mit Review-Verfahren

A crucial yet often-overlooked starting point for any Bourdieusian field analysis is to relate the field under consideration to the ‘field of power’, so as to enable an examination of its relative autonomy or heteronomy, i.e. its relation to other fields of society and to society as a whole. However, Bourdieu and his successors did not implement this key conceptual consideration systematically, or did so peripherally at best. For this reason both the theoretical and the empirical status of the field of power remain, for the most part, unclear. The fundamental philosophy of ‘methodological relationism’ has not been systematically applied, of all things, to a core element of Bourdieu’s theory of society which basically is a theory of power relations. We argue that a relational approach to the field of power is essential for theorizing the relation between (a) fields and (b) fields and the social space.

http://10.1177/0539018416675071

Seniorprofessur für Gesellschaftstheorie und komparative Makrosoziologie

Am Seemooser Horn 20
88045 Friedrichshafen